[ADDED] *new idea for stallions unable to breed
[ADDED] *new idea for stallions unable to breed 12 |
|
#119754 Posted on 2017-09-01 11:35:46
This suggestion has been marked as "Added To The Game". Thank you, 🄲hurchill 🅂tables, for the suggestion and to those of you who supported for making Equiverse better!
so, after three weeks of  discussions about the new lock placed on studs offered, I would like to make a new suggestion. For those who do not know why this lock went into effect I will outline it.
1 members like this post.
|
Posted By 🄲hurchill 🅂tables #107721 Member is Offline 212 forum posts Send A Message |
#119894 Posted on 2017-09-01 18:35:14
I think this is a sensible way to solve this problem. It would definitely prevent people abusing the manual cron to get indefinite studs, while not placing any limitations on those who play regularly.
2 members like this post.
|
Posted By UlyssesBlue #60734 Member is Offline 922 forum posts Send A Message |
#119942 Posted on 2017-09-01 23:51:31
I had chosen 5 because I saw some people say 3 and others say 7, so I went in the middle. The amount of time can change, however, Like I said before I think 5 days would be best because semi regular players won't have to keep putting their studs up again
2 members like this post.
|
Posted By 🄲hurchill 🅂tables #107721 Member is Offline 212 forum posts Send A Message |
#120699 Posted on 2017-09-06 18:28:59
Maybe add an option (like a drop down) for how many days the player would like the stallion up for stud before they have to jump onto the game to progress? Like 3, 5, 7 etc. but no more than 12 or 14?
0 members like this post.
|
Posted By AlphaDelta #103213 Member is Offline 30 forum posts Send A Message |
#120711 Posted on 2017-09-06 21:33:40
@alphadelta, I am so glad that you added in with your thoughts. It has been limiting my line as well! I think ulyssesBlue suggested something like this with breeding caps (or days). The more automatic and set the time is the less people have to worry about, i personally think. its all about the ease of access. The more hassle something is the less people want to do it. It also might be harder to code, but i am unsure of this. But, this might be a good feature for those who know they can't be on but once every few weeks.Â
0 members like this post.
|
Posted By 🄲hurchill 🅂tables #107721 Member is Offline 212 forum posts Send A Message |
#120714 Posted on 2017-09-06 22:22:54
I personally like the 3 day idea: after 3 days, the stud "locks" up again unless the owner progesses. That would be a nice happy medium, and solve both problems, as people who log in and progress at different times of day would not be penalized, nor would the people who just play two or three times a week. Although I prefer 3 days, I would be okay with 5, but I think any longer is unfair - people should have to log in fairly regularly to make money (from studs or anything else). For instance, to make money from shows or schools, you have to log in to put your horses in them! I don't like the idea of passive stud income for weeks at a time without having to check in and at least age your horses every now and then. This seems to actually penalize daily players, whose studs would age faster, die sooner, and make less money in their lifetimes. Just my two cents!
0 members like this post.
|
Posted By North #113155 Member is Offline 542 forum posts Send A Message |
#120716 Posted on 2017-09-06 22:37:47
@north! thank you for your input! I agree that it is unfair to users that log in daily. However, I just don't think there are enough that do it for the income to justify a very short limit. I personally would like to see 7 days as I am in college now and do not have time to dink around with anything but putting my horses in riding school. I know others said 3 days but I think that's a little low for the majority of players who have very busy lives. I would really like to see something implemented soon as this has been going on for quite some time now. I totally hear what your saying :)Â and I value your input. Â I I know that a majority of horses that are owned by players who progress semi regularly have their stud prices set very low. it would take hundreds of breeding to equal those players who have higher stud fees. I really doubt they are in it for making a buck or two without working for it. I agree that some people can abuse the system and some sort of check and balance should be put into place though. Thanks again for the input!
0 members like this post.
|
Posted By 🄲hurchill 🅂tables #107721 Member is Offline 212 forum posts Send A Message |
#120719 Posted on 2017-09-07 00:19:57
I don't think we want a time period longer than 5 days, as this would just bring back a variant of the indefinite studs issue. Even 5 days I'm beginning to feel is a bit too long. The shorter this time period, the less it can be taken advantage of with indefinite studs or similar, so I think it should probably be as short as we can get it without penalising daily or near-daily players. A time period of 2 days would ensure daily players faced no penalties, while 3 days would mean if you skipped a day your studs would be unaffected. So long as stallions wouldn't need to be manually re-listed every time this time period expired then there would be no real inconvenience from having a short time period.
3 members like this post.
|
Posted By UlyssesBlue #60734 Member is Offline 922 forum posts Send A Message |
#120746 Posted on 2017-09-07 09:22:48
@ulyssesblue, I totally agree that there is a fine  line between not hindering players and keeping those who wish to use the loophole at bay. I know many players are not able to do much during the school year as they are either in school or have children that are. I was hoping that 5 days would be a good compromise to those who have busy lives and suggested 7to 14 days as stated above and those who wish to keep it shorter to keep the loophole from happening. like I said before, a shorter grace period could happen if the stallion was not taken down from being a stud, but was simply removed from the option list of available studs. I am fine with either so long as it does not continue to limit game play to semi regular players :) thanks again for the contribution.Â
0 members like this post.
|
Posted By 🄲hurchill 🅂tables #107721 Member is Offline 212 forum posts Send A Message |
#120863 Posted on 2017-09-08 11:36:57
Personally, I rather 3 days or less for grace period. I can see players abusing grace period and 5 days are pretty long for a gameplay life span.Â
3 members like this post.
|
Posted By Bye #6637 Member is Offline 684 forum posts Send A Message |
#120865 Posted on 2017-09-08 11:57:12
I completely agree with Andromeda. Putting a grace period on studs that is longer than a couple days is just asking for players to abuse it like they were previously with the infinite studs.Â
0 members like this post.
|
Posted By Champagne-II #26323 Member is Offline 44 forum posts Send A Message |
#120868 Posted on 2017-09-08 13:02:45
I agree with Andromeda 100%. That's exactly what I was trying to say in my post, but didn't have the math to backÂ
0 members like this post.
|
Posted By North #113155 Member is Offline 542 forum posts Send A Message |
#120902 Posted on 2017-09-08 17:11:20
I am not saying this is a perfect solution, but if everyone can do it is it really even unair? Like I said about the compromise and fine line thing. Right now it limits game play to players. I don't think a two day  difference is that big of a deal, if everyone is able to play that way. I have high stated horses, very few players pay 50k for a public stud, at least in the qh world. Well, that's just my two cents. Thanks so much for adding to the post! I hope Abbey can find a good compromise for us all as I think we have exhausted every possibility. I personally am super frustrated with the restrictions on my game play. Thanks again guys and I wish you all the best!
0 members like this post.
|
Posted By 🄲hurchill 🅂tables #107721 Member is Offline 212 forum posts Send A Message |
#120903 Posted on 2017-09-08 17:17:21
remember, the days can be changed to three if need be, but the general idea is to have studs have some sort of grace period. Lets not get caught up on the trivial.Â
2 members like this post.
|
Posted By 🄲hurchill 🅂tables #107721 Member is Offline 212 forum posts Send A Message |
#120965 Posted on 2017-09-09 06:48:11
@CS,
2 members like this post.
|
Posted By Bye #6637 Member is Offline 684 forum posts Send A Message |
12 |